Posted by: NetworkHunter
Date: 30/06/1998
ive been trying to figure out which network actually aired back of bourke. contacted:
ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) - no records
Channel 9 - no records
Channel 7 - no records
Channel 10 - no records (tho they didnt start til 1965)
various regional stations - no records
this is bizarre, a show this many ppl remember should have SOME documentation somewhere, production files, broadcast logs, advertising, SOMETHING
what network did you watch it on??
Posted by: SydneyViewer
Date: 01/07/1998
i watched it on channel 9 in sydney mid 70s, im certain because i remember it came on after another show we always watched on 9
EDIT: just asked my brother he swears it was abc, but we watched it together!! how can we remember different channels??
Posted by: MelbourneKid
Date: 01/07/1998
definitely channel 7 in melbourne early 60s, my dad worked at 7 and mentioned show coming through, tho when i asked him last year he said he didnt remember it at all...
Posted by: AdelaideLocal
Date: 02/07/1998
we only had abc where i grew up (country sa) so must have been abc, black and white probably 1964 or 65??
tho my mum insists we watched it in color in 70s which would mean commercial station, but we didnt get commercial tv until 1971...
Posted by: NetworkHunter
Date: 02/07/1998
this is exactly the problem, everyone remembers different network, some remember black and white (early 60s) others color (70s or later)
but NONE of the networks have any record of it, ive even checked production companies that might have made it independently for syndication, nothing
its like show existed but left no paperwork trail whatsoever
Posted by: BroadcastHistorian
Date: 03/07/1998
i work in tv archives professionally, heres what makes this strange:
in 1960s every broadcast had to be logged by law, networks were required to keep detailed records of what aired when and how long, for licensing and regulatory
for show to have aired on ANY australian network and have zero records is essentially impossible, even if footage was wiped (which was common) paperwork should exist
only explanation i can think is it was broadcast illegally or outside normal channels, but that raises more questions about how so many ppl saw it
Posted by: TechTheory
Date: 03/07/1998
@BroadcastHistorian could it have been on some kind of test signal or regional frequency that wasnt officially logged?? i know there were experimental broadcasts in early days of australian tv
Posted by: BroadcastHistorian
Date: 04/07/1998
@TechTheory theoretically possible but unlikely, test broadcasts were usually just color bars and test patterns, and they wouldnt have reach to cover entire country which is where viewers report seeing show from
also test broadcasts werent scheduled regularly enough for ppl to have watched multiple episodes over time
Posted by: ConspiracyMind
Date: 05/07/1998
what if it was deliberately erased from records?? like coverup
i know that sounds paranoid but given how many ppl remember it and how completely its been erased from official records maybe someone WANTED it to disappear??
Posted by: NetworkHunter
Date: 05/07/1998
@ConspiracyMind i usually dismiss conspiracy theories but have to admit complete absence of records is suspicious, even shows networks are embarrassed by usually have some paperwork somewhere
this is too clean, too complete, like someone systematically removed every trace
but why?? what could be so problematic about 60s horror anthology it needed to be erased from history??
Posted by: RegionalStationWorker
Date: 06/07/1998
i worked at regional station in nsw in 70s and 80s, we used to get programs from all sorts of sources, syndication packages, direct from networks, even some international stuff
i have vague memory of back of bourke coming through in one of those packages, but when i went back to check our old acquisition logs theres a gap, like several pages missing from book
my manager at time said something weird, that certain programs "werent meant to be remembered" and we should just pretend we never received them, i thought he was joking but he was dead serious
Posted by: shiningbeacon
Date: 07/07/1998
@RegionalStationWorker very interesting "not meant to be remembered"
perhaps question isnt which network aired it but WHETHER it aired through conventional broadcast at all
there are other ways signals can reach televisions, luminous day to all
Posted by: SydneyViewer
Date: 08/07/1998
@shiningbeacon what are you suggesting?? that it was broadcast through some kind of pirate signal
actually has anyone heard of max headroom signal hijacking, that happened in US in 80s, someone managed to override official broadcasts
could something similar have happened here but with whole tv show instead of just brief interruption??
Posted by: BroadcastHistorian
Date: 09/07/1998
@SydneyViewer signal hijacking for single incident is difficult enough, hijacking signal consistently over weeks or months to broadcast entire episodes would require massive resources and technical expertise
and still wouldnt explain how it appeared on different networks in different parts of country at different times
unless... no im not going to suggest what im thinking because it sounds ridiculous
Posted by: NetworkHunter
Date: 09/07/1998
@BroadcastHistorian please share, at this point nothing sounds more ridiculous than situation were already in
Posted by: BroadcastHistorian
Date: 10/07/1998
fine heres my crazy theory:
what if show wasnt broadcast by any network at all, what if ppl received it directly on their televisions through some kind of localized phenomenon we dont understand
that would explain why everyone remembers different channels, why there are no broadcast records, why it appeared across country simultaneously, why attempts to record it often fail or show different content
i know it sounds insane but its only explanation that fits all evidence
Posted by: shiningbeacon
Date: 11/07/1998
@BroadcastHistorian not insane at all, there are more ways to transmit signals than conventional broadcast
question is who or what was doing transmitting and why
luminous day to all
Posted by: PodcastFollower
Date: 02/01/2026
the podcast is about to start, I heard a rumour that they've figured it out.
Posted by: NetworkHunter
Date: 14/01/2026
@PodcastFollower ive been planning to listen to the podcast too, if they've found anything theyre making more progress in weeks than we did in decades, doubt they can really work it out thouh